Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 vs Ridley Grifn 105 2x12
Both are close enough that people cross-shop them at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 comes out ahead (75% against 71%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Weight
- The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is 0.6kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
- Riding position
- The Ridley Grifn 105 2x12 sits you more upright (1.50 stack-to-reach against 1.39). The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
- Tyre clearance
- The Ridley Grifn 105 2x12 takes 38mm tyres against 34mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
- Mudguards
- Only the Ridley Grifn 105 2x12 takes mudguards, which decides whether it can be your winter bike.
Side by side
| Spec | Falcn 105 2x12 | Grifn 105 2x12 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,299 | £2,299 |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 9.2 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano 105 R7100 2x12 mechanical | Shimano 105 R7100 2x12 mechanical |
| Stack / reach | 1.39 | 1.50 |
| Tyre clearance | 34 mm | 38 mm |
| Lowest gear | 27 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | Yes |
| Comfort | 37 | 57 |
| Speed | 70 | 49 |
| Climbing | 65 | 57 |
| Value | 40 | 35 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bike