Skip to content
WhichBike

Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 vs Bianchi Arcadex Comp GRX 610

Both are gravel bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.

The short answer

For a typical all-round rider the Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 comes out ahead (77% against 63%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.

Trek

Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3

77% for a typical rider

✓ Checked

Bianchi

Arcadex Comp GRX 610

63% for a typical rider

✓ Checked *

What actually separates them

Price
The Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 is £40 cheaper — £2,750 against £2,790.
Weight
The Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 is 0.5kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
Riding position
The Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 sits you more upright (1.51 stack-to-reach against 1.49). The Bianchi Arcadex Comp GRX 610 is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
Climbing gear
The Bianchi Arcadex Comp GRX 610 has the easier bottom gear (21 gear inches against 25), which matters more than weight on anything genuinely steep.
Shifting
Only the Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 has electronic shifting. Crisper and lower maintenance, but it needs charging and costs more to replace.
Mudguards
Only the Trek Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 takes mudguards, which decides whether it can be your winter bike.

Side by side

Spec Checkpoint SL 5 AXS Gen 3 Arcadex Comp GRX 610
Price £2,750 £2,790
Weight 9.5 kg 10.0 kg
Frame carbon carbon
Groupset SRAM Apex XPLR AXS 1x12 electronic Shimano GRX RX610 1x12 mechanical
Stack / reach 1.51 1.49
Tyre clearance 50 mm 50 mm
Lowest gear 25 in 21 in
Mudguard mounts Yes No
Comfort 76 73
Speed 30 26
Climbing 59 58
Value 35 12

Neither might be the right answer

This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.

Find my bike

Related comparisons