Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 vs Merida Scultura 4000
Both are race bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
These two score within 1 point of each other for a typical all-round rider, so there is no single winner — the right one depends entirely on which of the differences below you care about.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is £1 cheaper — £2,299 against £2,300.
- Riding position
- The Merida Scultura 4000 sits you more upright (1.43 stack-to-reach against 1.39). The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
- Tyre clearance
- The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 takes 34mm tyres against 30mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
Side by side
| Spec | Falcn 105 2x12 | Scultura 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,299 | £2,300 |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano 105 R7100 2x12 mechanical | Shimano 105 R7100 12-speed mechanical |
| Stack / reach | 1.39 | 1.43 |
| Tyre clearance | 34 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest gear | 27 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | No |
| Comfort | 37 | 37 |
| Speed | 70 | 69 |
| Climbing | 65 | 66 |
| Value | 40 | 41 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bike