Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 vs BMC Teammachine SLR THREE
Both are race bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 comes out ahead (75% against 72%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is £100 cheaper — £2,299 against £2,399.
- Riding position
- The BMC Teammachine SLR THREE sits you more upright (1.44 stack-to-reach against 1.39). The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
- Tyre clearance
- The Ridley Falcn 105 2x12 takes 34mm tyres against 32mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
Side by side
| Spec | Falcn 105 2x12 | Teammachine SLR THREE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,299 | £2,399 |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 8.7 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano 105 R7100 2x12 mechanical | Shimano 105 R7100 mechanical 2x12 |
| Stack / reach | 1.39 | 1.44 |
| Tyre clearance | 34 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest gear | 27 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | No |
| Comfort | 37 | 39 |
| Speed | 70 | 65 |
| Climbing | 65 | 64 |
| Value | 40 | 35 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bikeRelated comparisons
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Cannondale CAAD14 3
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Canyon Ultimate CF SL 7
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Giant Propel Advanced 2
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Merida Reacto 4000
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Ridley Helium Disc 105 2x11
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Specialized Allez Sprint Comp