Merida Reacto 4000 vs Giant Propel Advanced 2
Both are race bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Giant Propel Advanced 2 comes out ahead (72% against 70%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Merida Reacto 4000 is £99 cheaper — £2,400 against £2,499.
- Weight
- The Giant Propel Advanced 2 is 0.3kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
Side by side
| Spec | Reacto 4000 | Propel Advanced 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £2,400 | £2,499 |
| Weight | 8.9 kg | 8.6 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano 105 R7100 12-speed mechanical | Shimano 105 12-speed mechanical |
| Stack / reach | 1.43 | 1.44 |
| Tyre clearance | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest gear | 29 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | No |
| Comfort | 37 | 39 |
| Speed | 64 | 66 |
| Climbing | 58 | 65 |
| Value | 34 | 33 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bikeRelated comparisons
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Giant Propel Advanced 2
- BMC Teammachine SLR THREE vs Merida Reacto 4000
- Canyon Ultimate CF SL 7 vs Giant Propel Advanced 2
- Giant Propel Advanced 2 vs Cannondale CAAD14 3
- Giant Propel Advanced 2 vs Ridley Helium Disc 105 2x11
- Giant Propel Advanced 2 vs Specialized Allez Sprint Comp