Marin Four Corners 2 vs Canyon Grizl CF 6
Both are gravel bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Canyon Grizl CF 6 comes out ahead (73% against 66%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Marin Four Corners 2 is £50 cheaper — £1,899 against £1,949.
- Weight
- The Canyon Grizl CF 6 is 3.0kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
- Riding position
- The Marin Four Corners 2 sits you more upright (1.53 stack-to-reach against 1.48). The Canyon Grizl CF 6 is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
- Tyre clearance
- The Canyon Grizl CF 6 takes 54mm tyres against 50mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
- Climbing gear
- The Marin Four Corners 2 has the easier bottom gear (21 gear inches against 25), which matters more than weight on anything genuinely steep.
- Mudguards
- Only the Marin Four Corners 2 takes mudguards, which decides whether it can be your winter bike.
Side by side
| Spec | Four Corners 2 | Grizl CF 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £1,899 | £1,949 |
| Weight | 12.5 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Frame | steel | carbon |
| Groupset | SRAM Apex 1 12-speed mechanical | SRAM Apex XPLR 1x12 mechanical |
| Stack / reach | 1.53 | 1.48 |
| Tyre clearance | 50 mm | 54 mm |
| Lowest gear | 21 in | 25 in |
| Mudguard mounts | Yes | No |
| Comfort | 81 | 70 |
| Speed | 10 | 34 |
| Climbing | 45 | 58 |
| Value | 3 | 47 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bike