Liv Langma Advanced 0 vs Cube Agree C:62 Pro
Both are race bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
These two score within 0 points of each other for a typical all-round rider, so there is no single winner — the right one depends entirely on which of the differences below you care about.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Liv Langma Advanced 0 is £100 cheaper — £3,299 against £3,399.
- Weight
- The Liv Langma Advanced 0 is 0.2kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
Side by side
| Spec | Langma Advanced 0 | Agree C:62 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £3,299 | £3,399 |
| Weight | 7.9 kg | 8.1 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano 105 Di2 12-speed | Shimano Ultegra Di2 R8100 12-speed |
| Stack / reach | 1.48 | 1.46 |
| Tyre clearance | 33 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest gear | 29 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | No |
| Comfort | 46 | 50 |
| Speed | 70 | 67 |
| Climbing | 71 | 72 |
| Value | 31 | 27 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bikeRelated comparisons
- Canyon Ultimate CF 7 AXS vs Cube Agree C:62 Pro
- Cube Agree C:62 Pro vs Giant Propel Advanced 1
- Cube Agree C:62 Pro vs Giant TCR Advanced Pro 2
- Cube Agree C:62 Pro vs Specialized Tarmac SL8 Comp - Shimano 105 Di2
- Giant TCR Advanced 0 vs Cube Agree C:62 Pro
- Giant TCR Advanced 0 vs Liv Langma Advanced 0