Giant Contend AR 2 vs Merida Scultura Endurance 4000
Both are endurance bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Merida Scultura Endurance 4000 comes out ahead (81% against 71%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Giant Contend AR 2 is £501 cheaper — £1,399 against £1,900.
- Weight
- The Merida Scultura Endurance 4000 is 1.4kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
- Tyre clearance
- The Giant Contend AR 2 takes 38mm tyres against 35mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
Side by side
| Spec | Contend AR 2 | Scultura Endurance 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £1,399 | £1,900 |
| Weight | 10.2 kg | 8.8 kg |
| Frame | alloy | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano Tiagra 2x10 mechanical | Shimano 105 R7100 mechanical |
| Stack / reach | 1.55 | 1.54 |
| Tyre clearance | 38 mm | 35 mm |
| Lowest gear | 27 in | 27 in |
| Mudguard mounts | Yes | Yes |
| Comfort | 69 | 63 |
| Speed | 29 | 50 |
| Climbing | 44 | 63 |
| Value | 37 | 58 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bike