Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race vs Colnago V4 SRAM Rival AXS
Both are race bikes at a similar price. Here is what actually separates them.
The short answer
For a typical all-round rider the Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race comes out ahead (73% against 67%). That is not a universal verdict — change the terrain or the priority and the order can flip.
What actually separates them
- Price
- The Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race is £115 cheaper — £4,999 against £5,114.
- Weight
- The Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race is 1.0kg lighter, which you notice on long climbs more than anywhere else.
- Riding position
- The Colnago V4 SRAM Rival AXS sits you more upright (1.46 stack-to-reach against 1.41). The Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race is the more aggressive of the two — quicker if you can hold it, harder work if you cannot.
- Tyre clearance
- The Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race takes 34mm tyres against 30mm — the single most common thing buyers wish they had more of.
Side by side
| Spec | Litening Aero C:68X Race | V4 SRAM Rival AXS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £4,999 | £5,114 |
| Weight | 7.4 kg | 8.4 kg |
| Frame | carbon | carbon |
| Groupset | Shimano Ultegra Di2 R8100 12-speed | SRAM Rival eTap AXS 2x12 electronic |
| Stack / reach | 1.41 | 1.46 |
| Tyre clearance | 34 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest gear | 29 in | 29 in |
| Mudguard mounts | No | No |
| Comfort | 35 | 42 |
| Speed | 84 | 67 |
| Climbing | 77 | 64 |
| Value | 4 | 0 |
Neither might be the right answer
This page assumes an average rider. Tell us how you actually ride and we will rank these two against everything else at the price.
Find my bikeRelated comparisons
- Colnago V4 Shimano 105 Di2 vs Colnago V4 SRAM Rival AXS
- Colnago V4 Shimano 105 Di2 vs Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race
- Colnago V4 SRAM Rival AXS vs Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 8 Di2
- Colnago V4 SRAM Rival AXS vs Rose Shave Ultegra Di2
- Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race vs Cube Litening Air C:68X Pro
- Cube Litening Aero C:68X Race vs Eddy Merckx Pevele Corsa Rival AXS 2x12